Free kindle book and epub digitized and proofread by Project Gutenberg. Go to the Main democracy in america volume 1 pdf. Find more ebooks by the same author.
Go to our mobile site. Bibliographic data of author and book. JK: Political science: Political inst. Public domain in the USA. 3450 downloads in the last 30 days. Table of available file types and sizes.
This article is about the book written by Tocqueville. Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville title page. In the book, Tocqueville examines the democratic revolution that he believed had been occurring over the previous several hundred years. In his later letters Tocqueville indicates that he and Beaumont used their official business as a pretext to study American society instead. May of that year and spent nine months traveling the United States, studying the prisons, and collecting information on American society, including its religious, political, and economic character.
Tocqueville believed that Beaumont’s study of the United States would prove more comprehensive and penetrating. He begins his book by describing the change in social conditions taking place. He observed that over the previous seven hundred years the social and economic conditions of men had become more equal. Tocqueville believed, was gradually disappearing as the modern world experienced the beneficial effects of equality. Frenchman never accepted democracy as determined or inevitable.
He did, however, consider equality more just and therefore found himself among its partisans. The remainder of the book can be interpreted as an attempt to accomplish this goal thereby giving advice to those people who would experience this change in social states. According to him, the Puritans established America’s democratic social state of equality. They arrived equals in education and were all middle class. In addition, Tocqueville observes that they contributed a synthesis of religion and political liberty in America that was uncommon in Europe, particularly in France. He calls the Puritan Founding the “seed” of his entire work. While Tocqueville speaks highly of the American Constitution, he believes that the mores, or “habits of mind” of the American people play a more prominent role in the protection of freedom.
He writes: “In no country has such constant care been taken as in America to trace two clearly distinct lines of action for the two sexes and to make them keep pace one with the other, but in two pathways that are always different. Because of his own view that a woman could not act on a level equal to a man, he saw a woman as needing her father’s support to retain independence in marriage. I should reply,—to the superiority of their women. United States while failing in so many other places. Tocqueville seeks to apply the functional aspects of democracy in the United States to what he sees as the failings of democracy in his native France. He contrasts this to France where there was what he perceived to be an unhealthy antagonism between democrats and the religious, which he relates to the connection between church and state.
Tocqueville also outlines the possible excesses of passion for equality among men, foreshadowing the totalitarian states of the twentieth century. He wrote that this growing hatred of social privilege, as social conditions improve, leads to the state concentrating more power to itself. 1835 and the other in 1840. It was immediately popular in both Europe and the United States, while also having a profound impact on the French population. Cambridge, Oxford, Princeton and other institutions. Tocqueville’s work is often acclaimed for making a number of astute predictions.
Noting the rise of the industrial sector in the American economy, Tocqueville, some scholars have argued, also correctly predicted that an industrial aristocracy would rise from the ownership of labor. He warned that ‘friends of democracy must keep an anxious eye peeled in this direction at all times’, observing that the route of industry was the gate by which a newfound wealthy class might potentially dominate, although he himself believed that an industrial aristocracy would differ from the formal aristocracy of the past. On the other hand, Tocqueville proved shortsighted in noting that a democracy’s equality of conditions stifles literary development. Equally, in dismissing the country’s interest in science as limited to pedestrian applications for streamlining the production of material goods, he failed to imagine America’s burgeoning appetite for pure scientific research and discovery. According to Tocqueville, democracy had some unfavorable consequences: the tyranny of the majority over thought, a preoccupation with material goods, and isolated individuals. In 1945, it was reissued in a modern edition by Alfred A.